Washington Libertarian Oct/Nov 2011

Washington Libertarian Oct/Nov 2011

Clark County Chair Hyrum Jones introduce the speakers at a Clark County Libertarian Party event on education Diana Moore of the Freedom Foundation (left) and Inga Galbraith from Family Learning Experience (center).

LP Clark Co. Education Forum

By John Elkins

On July 14, the Libertarian Party of Clark County held a public lecture focused on Alternatives to Public Education, at the local utility building meeting room.

Diana Cieslak Moore from the Freedom Foundation was first to speak to the crowd about internet schooling options as either a supplement to public schooling or as a home-schooling program in its own right. Armed with literature and a good approach to dealing with a myriad of questions Diana enlightened all about the power of the internet for educating pre-teens and teens as well as adults who want to go back and get their high school diplomas.

Inga Galbraith from Family Learning Experience (FLEX), a local Vancouver (WA) chapter is a support group for home-schooling families. She explained how the local school districts give only basic and rudimentary aid to home-schoolers and how FLEX pulls together to not only give their children a top notch education but also has gatherings to ensure that kids get proper socialization through planned activities.

Presided over by Libertarian Party of Clark County Chairman Hyrum Jones attendees learned a little about Libertarianism and our desire for these programs since privatization of schools (Charter schools) in Washington State is illegal. For more information about the Libertarian Party of Clark County see our website, http://lpclarkwa.org

The Initiatives; what to vote for and why.

At the September 17th meeting of the State Executive Committee held at the Seattle office the committee voted to endorse initiatives I-1125, I-1183, and oppose I-1163. The committee also voted to endorse Senate Joint Resolutions 8205 and 8206.

While the committee was quick to endorse I-1183, the liquor privatization initiative and oppose I-1163, the SEIU sponsored training initiative, the committee spent a significant amount of time discussing the pros and cons of I-1125 the transportation initiative sponsored by Tim Eyman.

Parts of I-1125 make sense from a Libertarian perspective. Other sections of it are questionable but overall the committee felt it was worth our support. One section that requires the legislature to set the tolls received considerable comment. In the end it was felt that even though the initiative lacks some points that we feel are important it is a step in our direction.

Help Wanted! There is a Representative position open on the State Executive Committee. If you are interested please contact State Chair Larry Nicholas at larrynicholas@comcast.net

We also need help with the website. If you have skills in this area we would like to hear from you. Please contact Larry Nicholas at larrynicholas@comcast.net

Washington Libertarian Oct/Nov 2011

Meet the new Chair; Larry Nicholas

I was elected chair at the May convention and many of you know me and we've worked together. For those who don't know me or my background, I’m from Bellingham. My father’s grandfather and family moved to Bellingham from Santa Monica about 1919. My mother’s family came from the Harz mountains region of central Germany to Bellingham about 1925. My wife is Jessica and we have 2 sons, the youngest graduated this last June.

I own a small business that my grandfather and great grandfather started in 1929 here in Bellingham. It is now Accurate Lock & Security, in the same location since 1936. I am active in various locksmith associations and hold certifications from them. I’m the Legislative chair for the NW Locksmith Association.

I'm also a member of the NW Business Club and serve on the Bellingham/Whatcom Chamber of Commerce Government Affairs Committee. In '07 I became a member of the Leadership Council for the NFIB (National Federation of Independent Business) Washington.

Since my oldest son joined Cub Scouts in the late 90’s, I’ve been very active in Boy Scouts. I have been a Den Leader, Webelo leader, Pack Committee Chair and an assistant Scout Master in the Boy Scout troop leading trips to Bowron Lakes twice and summer camps on the Oregon coast, the Olympic Peninsula and locally.

I have served on the board of my neighborhood association (Alabama Hill Association), as Vice Chair, Secretary and now as Chair for the 2nd year.

About '97 when Brett Whilhem came to town and bought me coffee, I became active in the Libertarian Party. The state convention in ’98 was my first and I have attended most since. At the 2006 state convention I was elected to the Judicial Committee, I've been a potential Libertarian Elector twice. When Bruce Gutherie moved to Seattle in '06, I was elected chair of the Whatcom Co. LP and continue to serve in that position. In '07 I was elected to the SEC. This year I took over as convention chair, holding the convention at the Phoenix Inn in Olympia.

My first national convention was in Anaheim in 2000, followed by '04, '06 & '08. I hosted the first Washington State Harvest Room Party in Portland (’06) with the second one in Denver (’08) & intend to host another next year in Vegas for the National LP Convention.

The Whatcom co. auditor formed a committee -CEAC (Citizen's Election Advisory Committee) to help decide which voting system we would change to from the punched card ballots. Bruce encouraged me to serve as the LP rep & I have since about '06.

Whatcom Fair Voting is a non-partisan group to work on election issues for CEAC but also for the state. We have helped write and pass legislation in the past. We usually hold a forum every year. This year it is on Re-districting. I have served on WFV since about '06 as the LP rep.

I'm a very busy person and require help with the party to make things work. Many of you currently serve or have done so in the past and I want to make sure you understand how much your efforts are appreciated. I must ask again, or for the first time, for your help in any way you can. We need volunteers to take on projects, help with getting the Meetup groups going and for next year’s presidential race starting with gathering signatures to get our candidate on the ballot. In addition to volunteers, we need donations whether it’s just the $25 membership dues or a monthly pledge of $5 or $30 through Donor Town Square, it all helps keep the party going.

I never thought I could be the state chair, certainly nothing I aspired to be. However, as you can see by my background, this is not the first time that leadership was entrusted to me. My fear is just that I can't live up to some of the past chairs of the party and that I might fail to do a good job in the position. It is for that reason and my other commitments that I ask patience of you and advice.

Larry Nicholas; Chairman, LPWA

Washington Libertarian Oct/Nov 2011

Forget King County Metro car-tab fees and bus cuts

By JEFF JARED
Kirkland Reporter Contributor
Republished by permission.

I must disagree with my paper’s support of Councilmembers Jane Hague and Kathy Lambert’s about-face to vote in favor of the $20 King County car-tab tax hike to bail out our socialist bus system in King County).

Instead of another tax hike to rescue our government-run monopoly and centrally planned bus system (King County Metro), we should just legalize private jitneys.

And similarly, limits on cab medallions (business licenses to drive a cab) should also end, breaking the taxi semi-monopoly as well.

The county bus monopoly loses money and can’t support itself. Sales taxpayers and car drivers must make up the difference between what the bus passenger pays and what the ride really costs.

As some have said, many buses are empty and most are too big. That’s government monopoly.

If we only had one grocery store to use because of a countywide monopoly, we’d riot. But we take a bus monopoly lying down.

We should break up King County’s bus monopoly by legalizing jitneys and other private, non-fixed-route carriers like motorcycle cabs (Thailand), minivans (Manhattan) and gypsy cabs (Russia).

Gypsy cabs are freelance cab drivers, like you or me, who need some extra money. Gypsy cabs could be fully freelance or in a loose organization. Jitneys are like buses but are more flexible in their routes and usually the size of minivans.

Let others “cherry pick” bus stops. Let a free market operate and transportation routes would flourish as supply meets demand. Government centrally planned monopolies don’t do this and always lose money requiring subsidy. See Amtrak and the US Postal Service.

And the federal Urban Mass Transit Act of 1964 should be repealed. There is no place for the feds in local transportation. Fixed-route monopoly bus systems using downtown cities as their hubs is a 1960’s idea that doesn’t reflect modern population and travel patterns.

Studies show that privatizing buses works. And jitneys and vans won’t be crashing over each other trying to get passengers. That’s a myth.

Is there a safety issue with “unknown” freelance cabbies? Well, a private certification system could help, but there is an element of hitchhiking here. But I used gypsy cabs all over Russia without a problem.

Why not $5 anywhere in King County? Today, this would require three bus transfers and take three hours, or would cost $60 in a cab. After deregulation, this would take 30 minutes and cost $5 in a jitney.

So when I’m driving back to Kirkland from Seattle on 520 on a sunny day with my convertible top down, I could swoop in at Montlake Station and grab a couple passengers for $2 each to help pay for the toll on the way to Kirkland.

Or if I’m a passenger at Montlake trying to get to Kirkland, I’d have two or three minivans, jitneys or gypsy cabs to choose from every five minutes, without having to board an over-engineered government monopoly bus on a 1960’s style fixed route that comes every 45 minutes, and loses money in the process.

Editor’s note: In February 1915, 518 private, unsubsidized jitneys carried 49,000 passengers daily in Seattle.

Washington Libertarian Oct/Nov 2011

Book Review: Now You Know the Rest of The Story The Big Short and Reckless Endangerment

Kelly Haughton

Originally published in theTacoma Political Buzz Examiner; September 22, 2011 - Republished by permission of the author

The late radio personality Paul Harvey used to end his stories with the line "and now you know the rest of the story." In other words, things are frequently not what they at first appear to be. The subprime mortgage crisis is one of those historical events with many twists and turns. It is difficult to tell the full story. And more facts keep coming out.

The Big Short by Michael Lewis and Reckless Endangerment by Gretchen Morgenson & Joshua Rosner give different perspectives about the leveraging up of American real estate.

Lewis is a fine storyteller and has enough understanding of Wall Street and the private sector participants to weave a fine tale. His depictions of the hedge fund operators who were among the first to realize that subprime mortgage lending machine was leading to financial disaster were wonderful insights into the difficulties associated with going against the prevailing worldview. In addition to having the insight there was a problem, they had to figure out how position their portfolios to benefit from others’ follies. Telling much of the tale from their perspective makes for a good story, but leaves out some of the most significant players in making the mess. The Big Short is an enjoyable read, but don’t stop with this book if you want to understand the big picture of subprime mortgage mess.

Advertisement

Morgenson & Rosner’s take on the situation is a more complete depiction of the causes of the subprime mess are more thorough, though they miss the color of the hedge fund operators betting against the proponents of subprime lending. In particular, Reckless Endangerment covers the roles of DC politicians and regulators as well as the operators of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two quasi-governmental organizations at the core of the problem. The book goes back in time to show the role of Jim Johnson, one time CEO of Fannie Mae, Franklin Raines, Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, and Angelo Mozilo. These people and others pushed banks and mortgage brokers to loan mortgage money to people who did not qualify using standard credit screens. Most people who took out subprime mortgages could not afford the homes they bought. Foreclosures were a foregone conclusion. But the mortgage brokers and investment bankers were bailed out by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guaranteeing the mortgages pools containing the subprime mortgages while mortgagees have been left with foreclosure and financial distress. Without Congress, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the real estate bubble would not have gotten as big and the casualties would not have been as wide spread.

Reckless Endangerment also covers the sins of the mortgage brokers, bankers and rating agencies in the fiasco, but fits these into the overall fabric of the total story. There is plenty of blame to go around in this mess, and this book does a nice job of spreading it around to the appropriate people.

Reckless Endangerment is a serious book about the crisis and deserves to be read by anyone who wants to understand the total picture of the crisis. However, since the book was completed before the implications of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac insolvency have become completely known, it does not cover the rest of the story.

In the first quarter of 2010, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac took onto their books almost $4.5 trillion of mortgage pools that they had guaranteed. These are mortgage pools full of subprime and other low quality mortgages. This means the government is on the hook for the principal for these mortgages. While it is unlikely these mortgages will be a total write-offs, it is likely they will be as large of a loss as the rest of the bailout process combined.

This $4.5 trillion will overhang the US capital markets and economy for years to come.

Thank you, Jim Johnson, Barney Frank and Angelo Mozilo.

Washington Libertarian is published by the Libertarian Party of Washington State.

4957 Lakemont Blvd. SE

Ste. C4-229

Bellevue, WA 98006-7801

Chair: Larry Nicholas,Vice Chair; Michael Donahue, Secretary: Miles Holden

Treasurer: Jim Culbertson

At Large Representatives: Tom Spanos,

Stan Lippman, Sarah Rittenhouse,

Michael Wilson; editor michaelhwilson@q.com

Washington Libertarian Oct/Nov 2011

JOIN the VOICES of LIBERTY Please Clip and Return

Become a regular contributor at ___ $10, ___ $20, ___ $50_____ $100_____ or more.

Please send a check with the enclosed envelope payable to the LPWA

Your signature please:______________________________

Your name (please print): ___________________________

Street or p.o. box____________________________ City ________________ State____ Zip___________

Care to contribute by computer? Then this is the place for you.

How to donate to the Libertarian Party of Washington State

You can do either a one-time donation or set up a monthly pledge with either of the two services listed. The membership dues for the LPWA is $25/year, so you might use that as a benchmark of what you might want to donate. Even a $5/month donation goes a long way. Please keep in mind that these services do have fees and just $1 more can help with those.

Donor Town Square: https://secure.donortownsquare.com/SSL/donate.aspx?sgst=0&amt=0&ai=414&qs=2T7CW

PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=YFC7WUWEKUW6L

Occupation__________________________ Employer:___________________________

Please check if you would like to be a  candidate, ___ Volunteer to help the party. ____

Thank you, The Libertarian Party of Washington State

Let us know about your group so we can post it on the web site and in the news letter.
Vancouver area Libertarians: meets the 2nd Thursday of each month: For location see lpclarkwa.org for information.

Bellingham area Libertarians: meet 4th Friday, 1pm @ Grand Ave Ale House http://www.meetup.com/NW-Washington-State-Libertarian-Meetup-Group/ Spokane area Libertarians: for dates and times see; http://www.meetup.com/Spokane-Libertarians/

LPWA Chair Larry Nicholas will be in the Tri-Cities are on Oct 22 and in Spokane on Oct 25 for meetings with the local membership.

Locations have yet to be determined. Please check the blog http://lpwablog.blogspot.com/ or the website https://lpwa.org/Home_Page.html for more information. We will post details as soon as we have them.

Well done is better than well said. ~Benjamin Franklin

LPWA june/july 2011 News & Views

Libertarian Party of Washington

News & Views June/July 2011

Well we had a photo in this location but it won't copy to this blog, so we'll have to do without it.

MHW

This year Washington Libertarians gathered at the Phoenix Inn in downtown Olympia for their annual convention on May 21^st. The event kicked off in the morning with opening remarks from Larry Nicholas, Chair of the Convention Committee and David Wordinger, the party’s Vice-Chair.

Brandon Houskeeper, Policy Analyst & Director of WashingtonVotes.org, from the Washington Policy Center discussed this year’s legislative session and how we could expect things to turn out.

Following Mr. Houskeeper Diana Moore from Olympia’s Freedom Foundation addressed issues related to online education and election integrity and problems with the proposed National Popular Vote Amendment that is being promoted nationally.

Closing out the morning’s speaker was Dr. Jonathan Wright, of the Tahoma Clinic who spoke about a number of issues related to how medical problems are handled today and some of the lower cost, healthier alternatives that are readily available to us in today’s marketplace. Of particular interest to Libertarians should be HR 1364 the Free Speech about Science Act that would address the Food and Drug Administration’s censorship of information.

Larry Nicholas was elected as Chair and Michael Donahue as Vice Chair. Jim Culbertson was elected Treasurer, Miles Holden as Secretary. Elected as At large Representatives were Tom Spanos, Stan Lippman, Gene Hawkridge, Sarah Rittenhouse and Michael Wilson.

LPWA New & Views June/July 2011

Thank you Rachel and David

As we begin a new election cycle the LPWA has a number of issues to deal with, but before we forget we wish to extend a BIG THANK YOU! to Rachel Hawkridge who has stepped aside as Chair. Being Chair of the LPWA and working with the national committee takes a lot of time and effort and not to mention it can be very frustrating at times. As a long time activist Rachel has proved to be a benefit to the party. Whether it was collecting signatures for a campaign or attending a legislative session in Olympia she was in the front of the effort and she was a voice for staying true to the mission in her post on the Libertarian National Committee. Rachel is not going away and will continue to help with preparing the news letter for mailing.

To say that David Wordinger has been a big champion of our efforts would be an understatement. He has spoken at public events and been a voice for the movement in the Spokane area, most recently at a Tea Party event a few weeks ago. Anyone who has driven from Spokane to the western side of the state as often as Dave has in all kinds of weather and paying for it out of his own pocket to attend conventions and state committee meetings deserves some special praise from the rest of us.

Below is a speech Dave gave recently at the Tax Day Tea Party Rally in Spokane.

In a free market no person or company can force you to buy their products. If their product is unwanted or too expensive, it doesn’t get bought. In contrast, Government can force us to purchase high priced unwanted products; permits to work on your own house, licenses for jobs or to operate a business, bridges to nowhere, and Amtrak are a few examples. Unfortunately we do not live in a free market economy. If a company finds nobody is buying its products, it can buy a few legislators and have them pass laws mandating the use of their products, or legislating against competition. Some pollution controls, mandated use of biofuels, import quotas, and subsidies are examples. Politics is often described as a zero sum game since a gain by any individual or group necessitates a loss by another individual or group.

Whoever has the upper hand in government can impose their choices on others. Since government has granted itself a monopoly on the use of force, those in power can use the threat of imprisonment or even death to force others to act in the “correct” manner.

What if you developed a millimeter wave porno scanner you called a security device and nobody wanted it because it is expensive and ineffective at detecting threats? Well if you can get the director of Homeland Security to impose a requirement for them at airports you can make a lot of money. And so can the former director of Homeland Security if his company, Chernoff Group is paid to shill for Rapiscan, the manufacturer of the otherwise worthless product. Israel and other countries with an active terrorist threat don’t want it. It isn’t used in embassies around the world. Our military doesn’t use them to secure their bases. But Rapiscan and Chernoff were able to use the coercive power of government to force taxpayers to buy their product.

Gun control laws are another example of people misusing government force to control others. These laws are obviously unconstitutional both federally and here in the state of Washington. These constitutions do not grant rights, but affirm preexisting rights. Even without the Second Amendment, Article 1 Section 8 does not grant the federal government power to restrict ownership or use of firearms or any other weapon. This lack of authority is emphasized by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments.

In 2003, while the Clinton gun ban was still in effect, a federal review of the nation’s gun control laws by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found no evidence the laws reduce firearm crime. A year later the National Academy of Sciences issued a report showing no link between gun control laws and

LPWA News & Views June/July 2011

gun violence, crime or accidents. You may not have heard about these studies. Since they reached the wrong conclusion they didn’t get much dissemination. I chose to mention these two because they were made by gun control advocates and were unable to justify restrictions on our constitutional rights. Other studies have actually shown increased crime with more gun control laws.

You might think the lack of any legal foundation or statistical evidence of any benefit might deter those wanting to restrict other peoples’ freedom. Exercising their property rights, they can prohibit firearms in their house or on their property, but that is not enough for them. Since they personally can’t impose their wishes on you, they go to government and try to have laws passed forcing you to comply with their wishes.

After every tragedy involving a firearm, politicians and bureaucrats propose more gun laws supposedly to deter people who do not obey laws.

We Libertarians have a better idea. If you don’t like guns, don’t buy one. Sigmund Freud said, "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Guidance for these immature individuals is provided by the NRA’s Eddie Eagle, who says, “If you see a gun: STOP! Don’t touch. Leave the area. Tell an adult.

Another issue is the war on drugs. The individuals in support of the drug war can’t directly control others, but they can get laws passed to use the power of government to try controlling them. I say try, because, like gun control laws, they don’t work. Like the criminals who use firearms to commit crimes, people who want to abuse drugs are doing so.

Marijuana or Cannabis is a natural herb with proven medicinal benefits. Yes, like many other things, it can be abused, but many people who have used cannabis recreationally have not become addicted and have voluntarily quit using it for one reason or another. Perhaps for some, the reason for quitting was being elected president of the United States.

Last month the National Institute of Cancer published information about the cancer fighting powers of cannabis. It’s been well known cannabis has the benefits of appetite stimulation, pain relief, and improved sleep, but now the government has finally admitted there is evidence cannabis kills tumor cells and protects nontransformed cells.

The anti-tumor properties of cannabinoids were documented at least as early as 1975. Our government is just now recognizing this while still proclaiming cannabis has “no accepted medical use.”

Why is a substance with the beneficial properties of cannabis illegal?

William Randolph Hearst owned millions of acres of forest which he used to make paper for his newspapers. The hemp industry was becoming a threat to the wood pulp industry and threatened to cost Hearst a lot of money. At this same time DuPont was developing new plastics that had to compete with hemp. Unable to compete in the free market, Hearst and DuPont went to the government and worked to get hemp outlawed. Like early gun control laws, there were also racial reasons for making cannabis illegal. Cannabis was being used by poor immigrants to relax after a hard day’s work in the fields. Xenophobes and bigots didn’t like seeing minorities using cannabis, so they used the coercive power of government to control other peoples’ lives.

In the last legislative session there were a couple laws to make life easier for users of medicinal cannabis. Some of our state congresscritters claimed to support medicinal use of marijuana but were concerned these bills would might allow others to use cannabis. Let me translate that from politician speak to common citizen talk. They don’t care if your mother is suffering terribly while wasting away from terminal cancer, it’s more important to keep you from smoking. Some people must lie awake at night worrying that someone somewhere may be enjoying something. I have a suggestion for those people. If you don’t like cannabis, don’t use it. If you see any cannabis:

LPWA News & Views June/July 2011

STOP! Don’t touch. Leave the area. Tell an adult.

I recognize drugs, including cannabis are not entirely benign, but if you are honest you must recognize drugs don’t cause as much harm as the government’s failed war on drugs. This is recognized by doctors like Dr. Ron Paul, by law enforcement like Sheriff Richard Mack and the members Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, and true conservatives wanting smaller less intrusive government like William F. Buckley. Some people say we must enforce laws against drug use because that is the law. Yet they have a different opinion on gun control laws. How many of these people were calling for the prosecution of Bernhard Goetz when Mr. Goetz used an illegal handgun to defend his life on a New York subway?

In 1949, Ludwig von Mises wrote, “Opium and morphine are certainly dangerous, habit-forming drugs. But once the principle is admitted that it is the duty of government to protect the individual against his own foolishness, no serious objections can be advanced against further encroachments. A good case could be made out in favor of the prohibition of alcohol and nicotine. And why limit the government's benevolent providence to the protection of the individual's body only? Is not the harm a man can inflict on his mind and soul even more disastrous than any bodily evils? Why not prevent him from reading bad books and seeing bad plays, from looking at bad paintings and statues and from hearing bad music? The mischief done by bad ideologies, surely, is much more pernicious, both for the individual and for the whole society, than that done by narcotic drugs.”

Some of you may have noticed I support my Second Amendment rights and after this talk may suspect I use some form of illegal drugs. No, I have never used cannabis, opium, LSD, or any other illegal drug. But the shirt I’m wearing is made of hemp. The shirt is imported since this is another industry our government has chased offshore.

I am not advocating anyone engage in any self destructive activity. I’m only asking that you do not use the coercive power of government to force others to abide by your standards. Tolerance of actions that hurt no one else does not mean you accept or condone those actions. But recognize people cannot make the right choice if they are not allowed to make a choice. If you are not willing to grant choice and freedom to others, don’t be surprised when your actions are turned against you to limit your freedom.

I would like to close with a quote by Chief Joseph. “Let me be a free man, free to travel, free to stop, free to work, free to trade where I choose, free to choose my own teachers, free to follow the religion of my fathers, free to talk, think, and act for myself--and I will obey every law or submit to the penalty.”

Authored by David Wordinger 2011

LPWA News & Views is published by the Libertarian Party of Washington State. LPWA

10522 Lake City Way NE

Suite C-103

Seattle, WA 98125

Chair: Larry Nicholas

Vice Chair; Michael Donahue

Secretary: Miles Holden

Treasurer: Jim Culbertson

At Large Representatives:

Tom Spanos, Stan Lippman,

Sarah Rittenhouse,Gene Hawkridge

Michael Wilson; editor michaelhwilson@q.com

Do you have a business or service you would like to advertise to other Libertarians? A business card size ad in each issue of the news letter cost $25. Quarter of a page $45, half a page $ 80 and an entire page $150.

Send your ad copy along with payment to Libertarian Party of Washington State

10522 Lake City Way NE, Ste C 103

Seattle, WA 98125

Or email michaelhwilson@q.com with any questions.